| Articles: | ||||||||||||||||
| L.A. Times Article...Taking Flight with Ace Advice Click Here to open pdf. Paso Robles Press Article...Driscoll Honored by Warbirds Click Here to open pdf. Ronald Regan Crew Welcomes Driscoll Article Click Here to open pdf. Stonehill College: Article
Commander William P. Driscoll '68, U.S.N.R., one
of the most highly decorated living Naval Aviators of the last fifty years,
has a message for people of all ages. Whether his audience is a classroom
of Navy jet fighter pilots going through the TopGun
Course Naval Air Station Miramar in San Diego, California,
an auditorium filled with Stonehill students, Lou Holtz, and the University
of Notre Dame football team or the youngsters he coaches on the little
league baseball and soccer teams in his community, his message is
always the same - make a commitment to do your best, stay focused and
persevere. It's as simple as that. What is not simple is developing the self-discipline that it takes to accomplish your objectives, to do the very best that you are capable of doing no matter how difficult the task. Bill explained his philosophy to a group of Stonehill students at the Joseph W. Martin Jr. Institute of Law and Society during a visit to the college in April. He mesmerized the students with his unclassified version of the "Air Combat" presentation that he delivers to every TopGun class. And Bill is qualified to speak on the subjects of winning and losing. He received his Navy Wings of Gold in 1970. His twenty-year career flying Navy jet fighter planes, he found, was a continual exercise in the survival of the fittest. Mentally, physically and psychologically he had to always be at his best. During his Navy career, Bill acquired approximately 3,200 hours of jet fighter flight time, flew 200 combat missions in Vietnam, and achieved distinction as a member of the Navy's only team of flying Aces (fighter pilots with a shootdown record during combat of five enemy planes). Bill has received the Navy Cross, two Silver Stars, The Purple Heart, 10 Air Medals, and a nomination for the Medal of Honor, as well as serving as a TopGun instructor. Only one out of every 2,500 pilots make it to TopGun and even fewer pilots who have flown fighter planes in combat become aces. Despite his many achievements, Bill remains a modest person. "I see myself as a normal, everyday, average
guy. I don't see myself as anything special, just a guy who did his job
and did what I was trained to do. We (my pilot, Congressman Randy Cunningham
and myself) were confident in our ability to do what had to be done and
enjoyed the challenge of having to work through intense pressure to accomplish
our objectives. We never thought about failure, although we faced many
life-threatening adversities and problems. We knew how to get through
them because we had been well trained and we are confident in our ability
to succeed. Make no mistake, I thank the good Lord for that, and I thank
the Navy for providing me with the training I needed to be able to succeed.
We were lucky in many areas, but we were also well prepared. We knew what
we were doing. Bill taught at TopGun for four years. Three years
ago he was invited back by the prestigious flight school to be a permanent
guest lecturer, and to give the "Air Combat" presentation. This
presentation focuses on winning and losing as it relates to today's high
speed, sophisticated jet dogfights. Bill emphasizes the importance of
the proper preparation necessary to achieve success in this high stress
air combat environment. Although Bill mainly speaks to TopGun classes,
he feels that anyone who strives for excellence under very stressful conditions
would benefit from this motivational lecture. (Lour Holtz, head football
coach at the University of Notre Dame, asked Bill to speak to his players
last year the night before their big game with USC.) According to Bill, today's highly complex $40 million
jet fighter planes have more than 300 different cockpit positions, nine
computers and 80 displays. The planes can fly at speeds in excel of 1,200
miles per hour and can sustain "G" forces in excess of 7.5 times
the earth's gravity. A typical catapult launch of a 34-ton fighter jet
off the flightdeck of an aircraft carrier takes less than two seconds,
with the aircraft accelerating to more than 160 miles per hour during
that time. (The force involved in this launch could shoot a brand new
Lincoln Continental automobile eight miles out to sea.)
During the lecture, Bill conveys to the pilots a sense of levels of apprehension, tension, anxiety and fear that they will experience during different phases of combat missions. But, he tells them they mist maintain a certain degree of mastery over their emotional response and psychological outlook in order to survive. Pointedly, the ability to to perform under this acute pressure is essential and failure to perform may cost them their lives.
Aces' Interview
Approach: Thorough knowledge of your aircraft and its systems is always stressed as a prime factor for surviving in combat. During your 1972 combat cruise, and especially during the 10 May engagements, how did your knowledge of the F-4 help you? Cdr. Driscoll: You go into a combat situation thinking you're well prepared, but you had no idea what you were getting into. It's dramatically different from what anyone has told you. The major thing I had to deal with - as do most combat aviators - is what we call the outer stratosphere of tension and anxiety, trying not to come unglued in a life-or-death situation. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying it isn't absolutely critical to know and understand procedures and NATOPS. But what happens to you in combat is so far removed for the NATOPS trainer that your daily surface consciousness fades. Your backup consciousness, which is all you have left, has to be absolute as far as your basic knowledge of the aircraft and tactics is concerned. Your surface consciousness will be tampered with in combat. I made up cards, with boldface and tactical problems; I was always reviewing quizzes. I wanted to know the materials cold, but I found combat is such a stressful thing in terms of how I had prepared myself. In retrospect, I should have spent much more time working on my basic procedures. During combat, intimate knowledge of NATOPS doesn't shoot down bandits or prevent them from shooting you down. What is involved is the fundamental makeup of the man, his aggressive spirit, his will to live and win, and his ability to correctly execute basic tactical procedures. Approach: Would you say that today's RIO does not have to be as aggressive as the pilot, but more knowledgeable about the systems? Cdr. Driscoll: I believe that for the best pilot-RIO team, both crewmen have to be psychologically aligned the same way. You need intensely dedicated, aggressive RIOs, especially in combat. It is critically important that the RIO have that same sense of enjoyment about the work. I always looked at it with a cold, detached, unemotional approach. When I had the chance, watching a bandit explode was a thrilling experience. Approach: What can you say about trying to keep yourself in position to be rescued while under fire during the post-ejection SAR effort on 10 May? Cdr. Driscoll: Well, when I entered AOCS, I was not a very good swimmer and was assigned to extra instruction, sub-swim. At the end of AOCS, I was on swim hold. It was not a day at the beach. All the instructors helped us, but the effort had to come from us. One day I was really working hard in the pool, determined to get through, and the light just seemed to come on. The water didn't seem to be trying to push me down; it was really enjoyable. And that was it. I passed all the swimming requirements that morning. During the mission on 10 May, we were hit by a SAM just south of Hanoi. Shortly afterward, there was heavy smoke and some fire in the cockpit. We didn't want to eject over land for fear of being captured. I knew the Navy's approach to water survival had helped me and I was confident of surviving an over-water ejection. I was more concerned with the remaining MiGs and other hostile fire. As we floated down after the ejection, I got my mask and gloves off and secured them. Then I got on the survival radio to broadcast our position. I was also able to wave at Randy to make sure he was OK. After I broadcast our position, I switched to the beeper and prepared to deploy my raft. I landed in the water about 15 minutes later. The landing could have a replay of D-WEST training. I flipped over onto my back and popped by koch fittings, just like in training. There was a little breeze, although I don't remember being dragged. Despite the dogfights and the SAM hit, with the D-WEST training I had received, the water entry was almost routine. (This is quite a statement for me to make since I had always hoped that after an overwater ejection I would land in water no deeper than my knees.) Approach: The SAR portion of your story has not been repeated as much as the aerial portion. Cdr. Driscoll: Well, the North Vietnamese sent two PT boats out to get us. I think they were just coming out to get two Naval Aviators and didn't know what Randy and I had just done. We swam over to the raft with all our gear on. I saw schools of sea snakes and I thought it would be prudent to get into my raft immediately. I was tired and I was probably functioning on adrenalin. I pulled myself in and relaxed for a moment. Then, I remembered the PT boats and got out of the black raft thinking I could hide behind it. (I couldn't' see the PT boats because the waves were too big. Also, I was in quasi-shock.) Approach: Did you get out of any of your flight gear? Cdr. Driscoll: No, I kept everything on, including my helmet, except for my mask and gloves. It was just like D-WEST at North Island. The helo put a swimmer in the water, while several Marines manned the machine guns. We got right on the hoist and were hauled up into the CH-46. I wanted to stand up, but they told me to lay down and relax. Approach: What makes for a superior combat aircrew, communication, knowledge? Cdr. Driscoll:
That's a good question. You'll find that sometimes your better crews in
training aren't necessarily your best crews in combat. I think it's a
combination of things. Combat, first and foremost,
is such a heavy trip, a place you've never been before; it is laden with
tension and anxiety - shooting, people crying on the radio, getting sick;
it's hard to put into words. Real confidence in your abilities is fundamental
to your survival. You develop this confidence first in training, doing the same thing over and over again. In the fighter community, you sometimes see guys with a lot of swagger and arrogance. Many times, those people don't do well in combat. I always felt the confidence to look for was the real confidence, someone who knows what they're doing because they've done it over and over. Also, one of the keys is not to get bored with yourself doing the same basic thing over and over. That always helped Randy and me. Kills in combat are produced not by great moves, but by avoiding or trying to minimize bad moves. You'll make bad moves - what I call gross mistakes, but your enemy will too. You want to capitalize on his mistakes and kill him. Try to never let a poorly flown bandit live. You want to continually work on minimizing the number of bad mistakes you make in training. None of this stuff about going up in the sun, dropping the flaps, reversing - that's stuff you read in books or see in movies. Approach: Is there anything else you can tell us? Cdr. Driscoll: I always read Approach when I was on active duty. There's a lot of excellent information in the magazine. As a matter of fact, Randy and I may not have survived that SAM hit I described if we hadn't read an article by then Lt. Duke Hernandez. The article dealt with handling an F-4 after it sustained major battle damage to the hydraulic lines. Hernandez recommended that aircrews faced with a similar problem severely restrict stick input when trying to control the aircraft's attitude. He felt the F-4 should be controlled by rudder only. In that way, the aircraft might fly a little longer before depletion of the hydraulic system. That's exactly the same situation we faced after the SAM hit. We still had 25 miles to go before "feet wet," and we used Hernandez's technique by doing a series of barrel rolls with no G. That's one of the main reasons I've always considered Approach a must-read for every Naval Aviator. It's fundamental to being the true professional you want to be. -- Peter Mersky |
||||||||||||||||
| Return To Top | ||||||||||||||||
| For more information on how to maximize the " Peak Pressure Performance" of your people please contact: | ||||||||||||||||
| Bill
Driscoll T
858.755.7990
|
||||||||||||||||